|
The Slavery Question and Civil War, 1844–1865
John Wesley was an ardent opponent of slavery. Many of the leaders of
early American Methodism shared his hatred for this form of human bondage.
As the nineteenth century progressed, it became apparent that tensions
were deepening in Methodism over the slavery question. In this matter,
as in so many others, Methodism reflected a national ethos because it was
a church with a membership that was not limited to a region, class, or
race. Contention over slavery would ultimately split Methodism into separate
northern and southern churches.
The slavery issue was generally put aside by The Methodist Episcopal
Church until its General Conference in 1844, when the pro-slavery and anti-slavery
factions clashed. Their most serious conflict concerned one of the church's
five bishops, James O. Andrew, who had acquired slaves through marriage.
After acrimonious debate the General Conference voted to suspend Bishop
Andrew from the exercise of his episcopal office so long as he could not,
or would not, free his slaves. A few days later dissidents drafted a Plan
of Separation, which permitted the annual conferences in slaveholding states
to separate from The Methodist Episcopal Church in order to organize their
own ecclesiastical structure. The Plan of Separation was adopted, and the
groundwork was prepared for the creation of The Methodist Episcopal Church,
South.
Delegates from the southern states met in Louisville, Kentucky, in May,
1845, to organize their new church. Their first General Conference was
held the following year in Petersburg, Virginia, where a Discipline and
hymnbook were adopted. Bitterness between northern and southern Methodists
intensified in the years leading to Abraham Lincoln's election in 1860
and then through the carnage of the Civil War. Each church claimed divine
sanction for its region and prayed fervently for God's will to be accomplished
in victory for its side.
The Methodist Protestants, the United Brethren, and The Evangelical
Association were not totally insulated from the slavery controversy. However,
they were able to avoid the passionate struggle that fractured The Methodist
Episcopal Church
Continue
|